Research Article

Acceptance of WhatsApp social media platform for learning in Nigeria: A test of unified theory of acceptance and use of technology

Tajudeen Ahmed Shittu 1 * , Yusuf Hamdalat Taiwo 2
More Detail
1 Department of Science Education, Federal University of Kashere, Gombe, Gombe State, NIGERIA2 Department of Social Science Education, University of Ilorin, Ilorin NIGERIA* Corresponding Author
Journal of Digital Educational Technology, 3(2), 2023, ep2309, https://doi.org/10.30935/jdet/13460
Published: 04 July 2023
OPEN ACCESS   610 Views   429 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

The study tested the efficacy of unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) for explaining the rationale for the acceptance of WhatsApp social media platform for learning among students of public and private universities in Nigeria. To achieve the goal of the study, a cross-sectional survey research method was employed. A questionnaire was deployed for data collection. The sample for the study was drawn from undergraduate students from two different universities. The data gathered for the study was subjected to structural equation modeling analysis using AMOS statistical package. Prior to that, series of analysis, such as descriptive analysis, (mean and standard deviation), inferential analysis such as factor analysis to ascertain the dimensionality of the factor of the study was computed. The study also established construct, content, discriminant and convergent validity. It also determined the internal consistency of all the variables of the study. All hypotheses generated for the study was analyzed by checking the effect size of the independent on the dependent variable of the study. The findings from the model of the study showed that the data fit the model of the study. The total variance explained of the model was 61% and almost all the independent variables statistically and directly influence acceptance process of WhatsApp media for learning with exception of effort expectancy that showed a negative effect on student behavioral intention towards use of WhatsApp for learning. The findings of the study have implication for students, teachers and administrators of higher institution of learning Furthermore, the finding of the study equally provide evident for the empirical strength of UTAUT for explaining rationale for adoption of social media for teaching 21st century learners.

CITATION (APA)

Shittu, T. A., & Taiwo, Y. H. (2023). Acceptance of WhatsApp social media platform for learning in Nigeria: A test of unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Journal of Digital Educational Technology, 3(2), ep2309. https://doi.org/10.30935/jdet/13460

REFERENCES

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  2. Alismaiel, O. A., Cifuentes-Faura, J., & Al-Rahimi, W. M. (2022). Online learning, mobile learning, and social media technologies: An empirical study on constructivism theory during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 14(18), 11134. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811134
  3. Almogheerah, A. (2020). Exploring the effect of using WhatsApp on Saudi female EFL students idiom-learning. Arab World English Journal, 11(4), 328-350. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no4.22
  4. Al-Sabaawi, M. Y. M., & Dahlan, H. M. (2019). Acceptance model of social media for informal learning. In F. Saeed, N. Gazem, S. Patnaik, A. Saed Balaid, & F. Mohammed (Eds.), Recent trends in information and communication technology (pp. 679-687). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59427-9_70
  5. Awidi, I. T., Paynter, M., & Vujosevic, T. (2019). Facebook group in the learning design of a higher education course: An analysis of factor influencing positive learning experience for student. Computers & Education, 129, 106-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.018
  6. Cetinkaya, L. (2017). The impact of WhatsApp use onsuccess in education process. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 18(7). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i7.3279
  7. Chao, C.-M. (2019). Factors determining the behavioral intention to use mobile learning: An application and extension of the UTAUT model. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1652. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01652
  8. Cifuentes, O. E., & Lents, N. H. (2011). Increasing students teachers interaction at an urban computer campus through instant messaging and online office hours. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 14(1), 1-13.
  9. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.
  10. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  11. Durgungoz, A., & Durgungoz, F. C. (2022). “We are much closer here”: Exploring the use of WhatsApp as a learning environment in a secondary school mathematics class. Learning Environment Research, 25, 423-444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-021-09371-0
  12. Eke-Okpala, H. N., Omekwu, C., & Odoh, J. N. (2014). The use of social media networking sites among the undergraduate students of University of Nigeria, Nsukka. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1195.
  13. Fattah, S. F. E. S. A. (2015). The effectiveness of using WhatsApp messenger as one of mobile learning technique to develop student writing skills. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(32), 115-127.
  14. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation model with observable variable and measurement errors. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  15. Gilsenan, K. (2019). Social media is changing, and it’s not a bad thing. https://blog.gwi.com/trends/2019-in-review-social-media/
  16. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., & Babin, B. J. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective. Pearson Education.
  17. Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  18. Humaid, A. B., & Ibrahim, Y. M. (2019). The examination of factor influencing Saudi small business social media adoption by using UTAUT model. International Journal of Business Administration, 10(27), 96-114. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijba.v10n2p96
  19. Kutu, J. O., & Kutu, F. I. (2022). The use of social media for academic purpose by postgraduate information studies students: A case of university of KwaZulu-Natal South Africa. Library Philosophy and Practice, 6917.
  20. Manca, S. (2020). Snapping, pinning, liking or texting: investigating social media in higher education beyond facebook. The Internet and Higher Education, 44, 100707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100707
  21. Odewumi, M. O., Yusuf, M. O., & Oputa, G. O. (2018). UTAUT model: Intention to use social media for learning interactive effect of postgraduate in South-West Nigeria. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 14(3), 239-251.
  22. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. Free Press.
  23. Sasu, D. D. (2022). Number of active social media users in Nigeria 2017-2022. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1176096/number-of-social-media-users-nigeria
  24. Sheppard, B. H., Hartwick, J., & Warsaw, P. R. (1988). The theory of reason action: A meta-analysis of past research recommendation for modification and future research. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(3), 325-343. https://doi.org/10.1086/209170
  25. Shittu, A. T., Gambari, A. I., Yusuf, M. O., & Alabi, T. O (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis of the dimensionality of students’ readiness of using social media for learning in Nigeria. ATBU Journal of Science, Technology and Education, 3(2), 116-128.
  26. Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing model. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144-176. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.6.2.144
  27. Veletsianos, G., & Navarrete, C. (2012). Online social network as formal learning environment and activities. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(1), 144-166. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i1.1078
  28. Venkatesh, V., Moriss, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology, toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  29. Vrocharidou, A., & Efthymiou, I. (2012). Computer mediated communication for social and academic purposes: Profile of use and university student’s gratification. ComputerS & Education, 58(1), 609-616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.09.015
  30. Wheaton, B., & Thorpe, H. (2019). Action sport media consumption trends across generations: Exploring the olympic audience and the impact of action sports inclusion. Communication & Sport, 7(4), 415-445. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167479518780410
  31. Yeboah, D., & Nyagorme, P. (2022). Student acceptance of WhatsApp as teaching and learning tool in distance higher education in sub-Saharan African. Cogent Education, 9(1), 2077045. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x:2022.2077045