Review

YouGlish: A web-sourced corpus for bolstering L2 pronunciation in language education

Ibrahim Halil Topal 1 *
More Detail
1 College of Foreign Languages, Gazi University, Ankara, TÜRKİYE* Corresponding Author
Journal of Digital Educational Technology, 3(2), 2023, ep2305, https://doi.org/10.30935/jdet/13236
Published Online: 30 April 2023, Published: 01 July 2023
OPEN ACCESS   709 Views   958 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

Manifold methods of applying technology for the teaching and learning of pronunciation have been advocated by scholars and researchers. With the advancement of technology, novel applications and software continue to be added to the list. In this regard, this paper deals with one of the recent websites primarily dedicated to pronunciation instruction through authentic and natural speech samples from various contexts. YouGlish is a web-sourced tool to access quick and unbiased answers to the colloquial use of foreign languages by real speakers across various contexts (Miller, 2019). Grounded on a number of theoretical rationales, YouGlish is a website that endorses data-driven learning, which fosters learner autonomy and discovery learning that hopefully contributes to the linguistic performances of its users. With this in mind, this review intended to explicate YouGlish along with its characteristics, specify the theoretical principles underlying it, outline its applications in language education settings and list some considerations for its use.

CITATION (APA)

Topal, I. H. (2023). YouGlish: A web-sourced corpus for bolstering L2 pronunciation in language education. Journal of Digital Educational Technology, 3(2), ep2305. https://doi.org/10.30935/jdet/13236

REFERENCES

  1. Bancroft-Billings, S. (2020). Identifying spoken technical legal vocabulary in a law school classroom. English for Specific Purposes, 60, 9-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2020.04.003
  2. Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Mossman, S. (2022). Corpora in instructed second language pragmatics. In R. R. Jablonkai & E. Csomay (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpora and English language teaching and learning (pp. 71-88). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003002901-7
  3. Beatty, K. (2013). Teaching & researching: Computer-assisted language learning. Pearson. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315833774
  4. Boulton, A., & Cobb, T. (2017). Corpus use in language learning: A meta‐analysis. Language learning, 67(2), 348-393. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12224
  5. Burns, A. (2012). Text-based teaching. In A. Burns, & J. C. Richards (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to pedagogy and practice in second language teaching (pp. 140-148). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024778.019
  6. Chen, C. M., Li, M. C., & Lin, M. F. (2022). The effects of video-annotated learning and reviewing system with vocabulary learning mechanism on English listening comprehension and technology acceptance. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(7), 1557-1593. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1825093
  7. Chen, M. (2022). Computer-aided feedback on the pronunciation of Mandarin Chinese tones: Using Praat to promote multimedia foreign language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2037652
  8. Cotos, E., Huffman, S., & Link, S. (2017). A move/step model for methods sections: Demonstrating rigour and credibility. English for Specific Purposes, 46, 90-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.01.001
  9. Dai, Y., & Wu, Z. (2021). Mobile-assisted pronunciation learning with feedback from peers and/or automatic speech recognition: A mixed-methods study. Computer Assisted Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1952272
  10. Farshi, N., & Tavakoli, M. (2021). Effects of differences in language aptitude on learning grammatical collocations under elaborated input conditions. Language Teaching Research, 25(3), 476-499. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819858443
  11. Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in crosslanguage research (pp. 233-277). York Press.
  12. Fu, J. S., & Yang, S. H. (2019). Exploring how YouGlish facilitates EFL learners’ speaking competence. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 22(4), 47-58.
  13. Goldhawk, A. (2023). The super quick guide to learning theories and teaching approaches. Learning Matters.
  14. Henrichsen, L. E. (2021). An illustrated taxonomy of online CAPT resources. RELC Journal, 52(1), 179-188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220954560
  15. Hinkel, E. (2022). Handbook of practical second language teaching and learning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003106609
  16. Hsieh, Y. (2020). Effects of video captioning on EFL vocabulary learning and listening comprehension. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(5-6), 567-589. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1577898
  17. Hsu, L. (2016). An empirical examination of EFL learners’ perceptual learning styles and acceptance of ASR-based computer-assisted pronunciation training. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(5), 881-900. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1069747
  18. Huang, S. (2015). Mixed-method research on learning vocabulary through technology reveals vocabulary growth in second-grade students. Reading Psychology, 36(1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2013.808723
  19. Johns, T. (1994). From printout to handout: Grammar and vocabulary teaching in the context of Data-driven Learning. In T. Odlin (Ed.), Perspectives on Pedagogical Grammar (Cambridge Applied Linguistics, pp. 293-313). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524605.014
  20. Karatay, Y. (2017). YouGlish.com. In M. O’Brien, & J. Levis (Eds), Proceedings of the 8th Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference (pp. 254-259). Iowa State University.
  21. Kartal, G., & Korucu-Kis, S. (2020). The use of Twitter and Youglish for the learning and retention of commonly mispronounced English words. Education and Information Technologies, 25(1), 193-221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09970-8
  22. Krashen, S., & Terrell, T. (1983). The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom. Pergamon Press.
  23. Kress, G., & Knapp, P. (1992). Genre in a social theory of language. English in Education, 26(2), 4-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-8845.1992.tb01061.x
  24. Levis, J. M. (2018). Intelligibility, oral communication, and the teaching of pronunciation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108241564
  25. Lewis, M. (1993). The lexical approach. Language Teaching Publications.
  26. Luo, B. (2016). Evaluating a computer-assisted pronunciation training (CAPT) technique for efficient classroom instruction. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(3), 451-476. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.963123
  27. Martin, I. A. (2020). Pronunciation can be acquired outside the classroom: Design and assessment of homework‐based training. The Modern Language Journal, 104(2), 457-479. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12638
  28. Martinsen, R., Montgomery, C., & Willardson, V. (2017). The effectiveness of video‐based shadowing and tracking pronunciation exercises for foreign language learners. Foreign Language Annals, 50(4), 661-680. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12306
  29. Masrai, A. (2022). Lexical knowledge and L2 general language proficiency: collocational competence and vocabulary size as determinants of lexical knowledge. Cognitive Processing, 24, 289-300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-022-01120-2
  30. McCarthy, D. (2018). Youglish.com: A promising tool for pronunciation dictionary lexicography. Annual Review of Education, Communication & Language Sciences, 15, 81-96.
  31. McCrocklin, S. M. (2016). Pronunciation learner autonomy: The potential of automatic speech recognition. System, 57, 25-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.12.013
  32. McGuire, M. (2009). Formulaic sequences in English conversation: Improving spoken flunecy in non-native speakers [Unpublished MA thesis, University of North Texas, Denton, TX].
  33. Miller, M. (2019). YouGlish. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 23(2), 1-10.
  34. Oladipupo, R., & Akinola, A. (2022). Nigerian English pronunciation preferences: A corpus-based survey of pronunciation variants. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 9(1), 2061104. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2022.2061104
  35. Otto, P. (2021). Choosing specialized vocabulary to teach with data-driven learning: An example from civil engineering. English for Specific Purposes, 61, 32-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2020.08.003
  36. Pennington, M. C. (2021). Teaching pronunciation: The state of the art 2021. RELC Journal, 52(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882211002283
  37. Pennington, M. C., & Rogerson-Revell, P. (2019). Using technology for pronunciation teaching, learning, and assessment. In M. C. Pennington, & P. Rogerson-Revell (Eds.), English pronunciation teaching and research (pp. 235-286). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47677-7_5
  38. Pleyer, M. (2023). The role of interactional and cognitive mechanisms in the evolution of (proto) language(s). Lingua, 282, 103458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2022.103458
  39. Richards, J. C. (2015). Key issues in language teaching. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024600
  40. Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024532
  41. Rogerson-Revell, P. M. (2021). Computer-assisted pronunciation training (CAPT): Current issues and future directions. RELC Journal, 52(1), 189-205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220977406
  42. Sardegna, V. G., & Jarosz, A. (2022). Theoretical and practical developments in English speech assessment, research, and training: Studies in honor of Ewa Waniek-Klimczak. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98218-8
  43. Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 206-226. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129
  44. Schneider, E. W. (2020). Developmental patterns of English: Similar or different? In A. Kirkpatrick (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of world Englishes (pp. 408-421). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003128755
  45. Sicola, L., & Darcy, I. (2015). Integrating pronunciation into the language classroom. In M. Reed, & J. Levis (Eds.), Handbook of English pronunciation (pp. 467‐483). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118346952.ch26
  46. Suzukida, Y., & Saito, K. (2022). What is second language pronunciation proficiency? An empirical study. System, 106, 102754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102754
  47. Teng, M. F. (2023). Incidental vocabulary learning from captioned videos: Learners’ prior vocabulary knowledge and working memory. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 39(2), 517-531. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12756
  48. Tsai, P. H. (2019). Beyond self-directed computer-assisted pronunciation learning: A qualitative investigation of a collaborative approach. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(7), 713-744. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1614069
  49. Uchida, Y., & Sugimoto, J. (2020). Non‐native English teachers’ confidence in their own pronunciation and attitudes towards teaching: A questionnaire survey in Japan. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 30(1), 19-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12253
  50. Veivo, O., & Mutta, M. (2022). Dialogue breakdowns in robot-assisted L2 learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2158203
  51. Vygotsky, L. L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
  52. Yenkimaleki, M., & van Heuven, V. J. (2021). Effects of attention to segmental vs. suprasegmental features on the speech intelligibility and comprehensibility of the EFL learners targeting the perception or production-focused practice. System, 100, 102557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102557
  53. Yoshida, M. T. (2018). Choosing technology tools to meet pronunciation teaching and learning goals. CATESOL Journal, 30(1), 195-212.