Research Article

Assessing Institutional Support to Online Education at Tertiary Level in Bangladesh Coping with COVID-19 Pandemic: An Empirical Study

Mohammad Nur Ullah 1, Bikram Biswas 2 * , Md. Mamun Miah 3
More Detail
1 Department of Public Administration, Bangladesh University of Professionals, Mirpur Cantonment, Dhaka, BANGLADESH2 Department of Educational Administration, Noakhali Science and Technology University, Noakhali, BANGLADESH3 Department of Statistics, Noakhali Science and Technology University, Noakhali, BANGLADESH* Corresponding Author
Journal of Digital Educational Technology, 2022, 2(1), ep2204,
OPEN ACCESS   352 Views   197 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)


Institutional support and quality education are linked in a significant way. During COVID-19, institutional support is critical to closing the huge academic gap that has emerged as physical academic practices have been moved to a virtual education system using technology. This research aims to assess institutional support for online education in Bangladesh during the COVID-19 pandemic. This analysis focused on the three main elements of the adapted model of institutional support (AMIS) of Bond et al. (2007), and the institutional support model (ISM) of Valverde and Rodriguez (2002), namely financial support (FS), technical support (TS), and mentoring support (MS). The findings of this research are, a few universities in Bangladesh have provided average support for continuing online education, while others have just started taking online classes. Several problems have been discovered, such as the lack of dedicated software for conducting online academic activities, lack of training and grooming, lack of mentoring, poor internet access, lack of smartphones, high internet package rates, and so on. This study concludes with some policy recommendations for a smooth online education system in Bangladesh.


Ullah, M. N., Biswas, B., & Miah, M. M. (2022). Assessing Institutional Support to Online Education at Tertiary Level in Bangladesh Coping with COVID-19 Pandemic: An Empirical Study. Journal of Digital Educational Technology, 2(1), ep2204.


  1. Alamgir, M. (2020). Cost of online classes: Extra burden on parents, teachers. The Daily Star.
  2. Al-Amin, M., Al Zubayer, A., Deb, B., & Hasan, M. (2021). Status of tertiary level online class in Bangladesh: Students’ response on preparedness, participation and classroom activities. Heliyon, 7(1), e05943.
  3. Al-Enazi, G. T. (2016). Institutional support for academic stato adopt virtual learning environments (VLEs) in Saudi Arabian universities [Doctoral thesis, Durham University].
  4. Bangert, A. W. (2006). Identifying factors underlying the quality of online teaching effectiveness: An exploratory study. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 17(2), 79-99.
  5. Battistich, V., Solomon, D., & Kim, D. (1995). Schools as communities, poverty levels of student populations, and students’ attitudes, motives, and performance. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 627-658.
  6. Bennett, C. F., & Monds, K. E. (2008). Online courses the real challenge is motivation. College Teaching Methods & Styles Journal, 4(6), 1-6.
  7. Biswas, B., Roy, S. K., & Roy, F. (2020). Students perception of mobile learning during COVID-19 in Bangladesh: University student perspective. Aquademia, 4(2), ep20023.
  8. Bond, M. L., Cason, C. L, & Gray, J. R. (2015). The adapted model of institutional support for Hispanic student degree completion: Revisions and recommendations. Hispanic Health Care International, 13(1), 38-45.
  9. Bottiani, J. H., Bradshaw, C. P., & Mendelson, T. (2016). Inequality in Black and White high school students’ perceptions of school support: An examination of race in context. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(6), 1176-1191.
  10. Cornell, D., Shukla, K., & Konold, T. R. (2016). Authoritative school climate and student academic engagement, grades, and aspirations in middle and high schools. AERA Open, 2(2), 1-18.
  11. Dhaka Tribune. (December 31, 2020). The rise of online education. Dhaka Tribune.
  12. Godshalk, V. M., & Sosik, J. J. (2000). Does mentor-protégé agreement on mentor leadership behavior influence the quality of amentoring relationship? Group & Organization Management, 25(3), 291-317.
  13. Gorsky, P., & Blau, I. (2009). Online teaching effectiveness: A tale of two instructors. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(3), 1-27.
  14. Gottfredson, L. S. (1996). Gottfredson’s theory of circumscription and compromise. In D. Brown, & L. Brooks (Eds.), Career choice and development (pp. 179-232). Jossey-Bass.
  15. Gottfredson, L. S. (2002). Gottfredson’s theory of circumscription, compromise, and self. Jossey-Bass.
  16. Hegstad, C. D. (1999). Formal mentoring as a strategy for human resource development: A review of research. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 10(1), 383-391.
  17. Islam, M. S., Tanvir, K. M., Amin, M., & Salman, M. (2020). Online classes for university students in Bangladesh during the Covid-19 pandemic-is it feasible? The Business Standard.
  18. Jasim, M. M. (2020). Private university students taking online classes. The Business Standard.
  19. Khan, M. S. H., & Abdou, B. O. (2021). Flipped classroom: How higher education institutions (HEIs) of Bangladesh could move forward during COVID-19 pandemic. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 4(1), 100187.
  20. Kotok, S., Ikoma, S., & Bodovski, K. (2016). School climate and dropping out of school in the era of accountability. American Journal of Education, 122(4), 569-599.
  21. Lavy, V. (2002). Evaluating the effect of teachers’ group performance incentives on pupil achievement. Journal of Political Economy, 110(6), 1286-1317.
  22. Moralista, R., & Oducado, R. M. (2020). Faculty perception toward online education in a state college in the Philippines during the Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(10), 4736-4742.
  23. Muilenburg, L. Y., & Berge, Z. L. (2005). Student barriers to online learning: A factor analytic study. Distance Education, 26(1), 29-48.
  24. OECD. (2008). Tertiary education for the knowledge society. OECD.
  25. Panday, P. K. (2020). Online classes and lack of interactiveness. Daily Sun.
  26. Rahman, N., E. (2020). Online education during COVID-19: Prospects, challenges and way forward. The Independent.
  27. Ramij, Md. G., & Sultana, A. (2020). Preparedness of online classes in developing countries amid COVID-19 outbreak: A perspective from Bangladesh. SSRN.
  28. Saint, W., Harnett, T. A., & Strassner, E. (2003). Higher education in Nigeria: A status report. Higher Education Policy, 16(2003), 259-281.
  29. Schrum, L., & Hong, S. (2002). Dimensions and strategies for online success: Voices from experienced educators. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1), 57-67.
  30. Shrestha, S., Haque, S., Dawadi, S., Giri, R. A. (2022). Preparations for and practices of online education during the Covid-19 pandemic: A study of Bangladesh and Nepal. Education Information Technology, 27, 243-265.
  31. Sife, A. S., Lwoga, E. T., & Sanga, C. (2007). New technologies for teaching and learning: Challenges for higher learning institutions in developing countries. International Journal of Education and Development Using ICT, 3(2), 57-67.
  32. Sirkemaa, S. (2001). Information technology in developing a meta-learning environment. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning.
  33. Sujan, S. (2020). 63 universities taking online classes, 70% students. Bonik Barta.
  34. Sweeney, B. (2004). Ask the mentor of mentors: A collection of answers to frequently asked questions. Teacher Mentors.
  35. Tabassum, M., Mannan, S. E., Parvej, M. I., & Ahmed, F. (2021). Online education during COVID-19 in Bangladesh: University teachers’ perspective. Aquademia, 5(1), ep21005.
  36. Tariq, S. B., & Fami, T. (2020). Is online education system suitable for Bangladesh? The Business Standard. n-system-suitable-bangladesh-112546
  37. Valdez, G., Fulton, K., Glenn, A., Wimmer, N. A., & Blomeyer, R. (2004). Effective technology integration in teacher education: A comparative study of six programs. Innovate Journal of Online Education, 1(1).
  38. Valverde, M., & Rodriguez, R. (2002). Increasing Mexican American doctoral degrees: The role of institutions of higher education. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 1, 51-58.