Research Article

Examining the self-regulated learning of ELT PhD students utilizing the Study Together chat server

Can Ece Boz 1 *
More Detail
1 Başkent University, Ankara, TURKEY* Corresponding Author
Journal of Digital Educational Technology, 5(2), July 2025, ep2511, https://doi.org/10.30935/jdet/16827
Submitted: 18 February 2025, Published: 28 August 2025
OPEN ACCESS   132 Views   36 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to study the self-regulated learning (SRL) of English language teaching (ELT) PhD students utilizing the Study Together chat server. Within the scope of this study, students doing doctorate at ELT department in Turkey participated an online platform to use SRL strategies. These PhD students met regularly on this platform and used their study time, where they could use SRL strategies both individual and as a group. This research has been completely qualitatively designed, and data has been collected through interview, observation and learning logs. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data. The participants considered the chat server useful for a number of tasks, such as setting objectives, getting reminders, monitoring time passing, and gathering work data.
Keywords: self-regulated learning, self-directed learning, Study Together chat, perceptions, learning strategies

CITATION (APA)

Boz, C. E. (2025). Examining the self-regulated learning of ELT PhD students utilizing the Study Together chat server. Journal of Digital Educational Technology, 5(2), ep2511. https://doi.org/10.30935/jdet/16827

REFERENCES

  1. Al-Abdullatif, A. M., & Alsubaie, M. A. (2022). Using digital learning platforms for teaching Arabic literacy: A post-pandemic mobile learning scenario in Saudi Arabia. Sustainability, 14(19), Article 11868. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141911868
  2. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
  3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
  4. Bazeley, P. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: Practical strategies. SAGE.
  5. Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2018). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (6th ed.). Pearson.
  6. Boon, E. T. (2020). Self-regulated learning skills of prospective music teachers in Turkey. International Journal of Music Education, 38(3), 415–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761420909919
  7. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  8. Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007
  9. Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
  10. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE.
  11. Darwin, M., & Burhan, R. (2021). Blended learning: Improving student engagement and performance in science. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1796(1), Article 012021. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1796/1/012021
  12. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE.
  13. Dignath, C., & Büttner, G. (2008). Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students: A meta-analysis on intervention studies at primary and secondary school level. Metacognition and Learning, 3(3), 231–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9029-x
  14. Ertmer, P. A. (2020). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299597
  15. Fernández Ortube, A., Panadero, E., & Dignath, C. (2024). Self-regulated learning interventions for pre-service teachers: A systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 36, Article 113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09919-5
  16. Fontana, A., & Frey, J. H. (2018). Interviewing: The art of science. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed., pp. 877–890). SAGE.
  17. Gillham, B. (2005). Research interviewing: The range of techniques. Open University Press.
  18. Hong, J.-C., Lee, Y.-F., & Ye, J.-H. (2021). Procrastination predicts online self-regulated learning and online learning ineffectiveness during the coronavirus lockdown. Personality and Individual Differences, 174, Article 110673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110673
  19. Hunutlu, Ş. (2023). Self-regulation strategies in online EFL/ESL learning: A systematic review. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 14(2), 136–166. https://doi.org/10.37237/140203
  20. La Scala, J. A., Aad, G., Vonèche Cardia, I., & Gillet, D. (2022). Developing transversal skills and strengthening collaborative blended learning activities in engineering education: A pilot study. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET) (pp. 1–8). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITHET56107.2022.10031948
  21. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705
  22. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
  23. Miatun, A., & Muntazhimah, M. (2018). The effect of discovery learning and problem-based learning on middle school students’ self-regulated learning. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 948, Article 012021. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/948/1/012021
  24. Morse, J. M. (2015). Critical analysis of strategies for determining rigor in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Health Research, 25(9), 1212–1222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315588501
  25. Ng, D. T. K., Tan, C. W., & Leung, J. K. L. (2024). Empowering student self-regulated learning and science education through ChatGPT: A pioneering pilot study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(4), 1328–1353. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13454
  26. Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
  27. Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422
  28. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). SAGE.
  29. Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 315–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9
  30. Peters, M., Catasús, M., & Carbonell, M. (2022). Finding balance through connected learning designs: Disentangling self-regulated and co-regulated learning in online postgraduate education. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2022(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.752
  31. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50043-3
  32. Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x
  33. Pintrich, P. R., & Zusho, A. (2002). The development of academic self-regulation: The role of cognitive and motivational factors. In A. Wigfield, & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Developments of achievement motivation (pp. 249–284). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012750053-9/50012-7
  34. Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). SAGE.
  35. Seidman, I. (2013). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (4th ed.). Teachers College Press.
  36. Seifert, T., & Har-Paz, C. (2020). The effects of mobile learning in an EFL class on self-regulated learning and school achievement. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 12(4), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJMBL.2020070104
  37. Smith, J. A. (2015). Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (3rd ed.). SAGE.
  38. Soares, F., Lopes, A. P. (2023). Structured interactive learning materials and student engagement in a flipped learning experience. In 17th International Technology, Education and Development Conference (pp. 597–604) 13(4). https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2023.0206
  39. Taylor, S. J., & Bogdan, R. (1998). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource. Wiley.
  40. Udoudom, U., George, K., & Igiri, A. (2023). Impact of digital learning platforms on behaviour change communication in public health education. Pancasila International Journal of Applied Social Science, 2(01), 110–125. https://doi.org/10.59653/pancasila.v2i01.512
  41. Warschauer, M. (2019). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. MIT Press.
  42. Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (2008). The weave of motivation and self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk, & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 297–314). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  43. Winters, F., Greene, J., & Costich, C. (2008). Self-regulation of learning within computer-based learning environments: A critical analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 20(4), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9080-9
  44. Yaşar, M. Ö. (2024). The effects of self-made videos on students’ self-regulated learning, L2 speaking performance, and course achievement in a MOOC-based flipped classroom model [PhD thesis, Bahçeşehir University].
  45. Zhang, S., Che, S., Nan, D., & Kim, J. H. (2023). How does online social interaction promote students’ continuous learning intentions? Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1098110. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1098110
  46. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000a). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). Academic Press.
  47. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000b). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1016
  48. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
  49. Zimmerman, B. J. (2011). Motivational sources and outcomes of self-regulated learning and performance. In B. J. Zimmerman, & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 49–64). Routledge.
  50. Zimmerman, B. J. (2013). From cognitive modeling to self-regulation: A social cognitive career path. Educational Psychologist, 48(3), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.794676