Research Article

Think-pair-share based flipped classroom: A model for improving students’ learning achievement and self-efficacy

Kamaludeen Samaila 1 2 * , Chau Kien Tsong 1 , Mona Masood 1 , Brandford Bervell 3
More Detail
1 School of Instructional Technology and Multimedia, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, MALAYSIA2 Department of Science Education, Kebbi State University of Science and Technology, Aliero, NIGERIA3 University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, GHANA* Corresponding Author
Journal of Digital Educational Technology, 4(1), 2024, ep2410, https://doi.org/10.30935/jdet/14422
Published Online: 27 March 2024, Published: 01 April 2024
OPEN ACCESS   138 Views   143 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

The lack of clear instruction and teaching strategy during the in-class learning activities of flipped classroom (FC) model has affected the model’s efficacy. This study aims to improve FC model by proposing the think-pair-share-based flipped classroom model (TPS-FCM). This study investigates the effect of TPS-FCM on students’ academic achievement and self-efficacy in an information and communications technology (ICT) in education course. One hundred and seventy-three students were involved in the quasi-experimental study. The students in the experimental group (n=91) learned with TPS-FCM, and students in the control group (n=82) used the conventional flipped classroom model (CFCM). Pre-test, post-test, and survey were employed. Results showed that TPS-FCM significantly improved students’ ICT learning achievement and self-efficacy compared to CFCM. Gender was found to have been significantly affected by TPS-FCM in students’ learning achievement but not in self-efficacy. This study recommends think-pair-share (TPS) strategy to improve in-class activities in FC model. Moreover, the study has limitations because of using two different teachers, which might affect students’ learning achievement and self-efficacy. Nonetheless, this study contributed that integrating TPS into FC model improves in-class learning activities. Integrating TPS into the in-class learning activities proved the budding support to enhance the efficacy of FC model. Based on the results of this study, the authors suggested that flipped practitioners can use the think-pair-share strategy to minimize in-class issues, particularly the lack of clear instruction and teaching strategy. Many practical studies of FC model have already been conducted. The originality of this work is in the fact that it proposes a suitable strategy (TPS) to improve the in-class learning activities of the model. The study also explores the effect of the proposed model on students’ learning achievement and self-efficacy, which enrich the current literature.

CITATION (APA)

Samaila, K., Tsong, C. K., Masood, M., & Bervell, B. (2024). Think-pair-share based flipped classroom: A model for improving students’ learning achievement and self-efficacy. Journal of Digital Educational Technology, 4(1), ep2410. https://doi.org/10.30935/jdet/14422

REFERENCES

  1. Adigun, J., Onihunwa, J., Irunokhai, E., Sada, Y., & Adesina, O. (2015). Effect of gender on students’ academic performance in computer studies in secondary schools in New Bussa, Borgu Local Government of Niger State. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(33), 1-7.
  2. Alhasani, H. M. A. (2017). The effects of flipped learning with peer instruction on ESL students’ engagement and reading comprehension [PhD thesis, Universiti Sains Malaysia].
  3. Bello, S. B., Samaila, K., Bashar, A., & Sani, M. A. (2023). An empirical investigation of computer literacy among students of College of Health Sciences and Technology in Kebbi State. Journal of Mathematical Sciences & Computational Mathematics, 4(3), 311-322. https://doi.org/10.15864/jmscm.4305
  4. Bishop, J., & Verleger, M. (2013). Testing the flipped classroom with model-eliciting activities and video lectures in a mid-level undergraduate engineering course. In Proceedings of the IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (pp. 161-163). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2013.6684807
  5. Brush, T., Glazewski, K. D., & Hew, K. F. (2008). Development of an instrument to measure preservice teachers’ technology skills, technology beliefs, and technology barriers. Computers in the Schools, 25(1-2), 112-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380560802157972
  6. Cakiroglu, U., & Ozturk, M. (2017). Flipped classroom with problem based activities: Exploring self-regulated learning in a programming language course. Educational Technology and Society, 20(1), 337-349.
  7. Chen, S. C., Yang, S. J. H., & Hsiao, C. C. (2016). Exploring student perceptions, learning outcome and gender differences in a flipped mathematics course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(6), 1096-1112. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12278
  8. Chen, Y. T., Liou, S., & Chen, L. F. (2019). The relationships among gender, cognitive styles, learning strategies, and learning performance in the flipped classroom. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 35(4-5), 395-403. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1543082
  9. Dauda, S., & Samaila, K. (2019). In-depth and systematic study of level of knowledge , skills and utilization of information and communication technologies (ICTS) among secondary school physics teachers. International Journal of Advanced Education and Research, 4(1), 27-31.
  10. Efiuvwere, R. A., & Fomsi, E. F. (2019). Flipping the mathematics classroom to enhance senior secondary students interest. International Journal of Mathematics Trends and Technology, 65(2), 95-101. https://doi.org/10.14445/22315373/ijmtt-v65i2p516
  11. Emelda, E., Sam, O., Azubuike, N., & Angela, C. (2019). Improving students’ participation in chemistry learning through the use of flipped classroom instruction. International Journal of Innovative Research and Advanced Studies, 6(2), 105-110.
  12. Flipped Learning Network (FLN) (2014). What is flipped learning? http://flippedlearning.org/cms/lib07/VA01923112/Centricity/Domain/46/FLIP_hando ut_FNL_ Web.pdf
  13. Fraga, L. M., & Harmon, J. (2014). The flipped classroom model of learning in higher education: An investigation of preservice teachers’ perspectives and achievement. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 31(1), 18-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2014.967420
  14. Gebhardt, E., Thomson, S., Ainley, J., & Hillman, K. (2019). Introduction to gender differences in computer and information literacy. In Gender differences in computer and information literacy (pp. 1-12). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26203-7_1
  15. Heijstra, T. M., & Sigurðardóttir, M. S. (2018). The flipped classroom: Does viewing the recordings matter? Active Learning in Higher Education, 19(3), 211-223. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417723217
  16. Hsia, L.-H., Hwang, G.-J., & Lin, C.-J. (2019). A WSQ-based flipped learning approach to improving students’ dance performance through reflection and effort promotion. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(1), 229-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1651744
  17. Huang, B., Hew, K. F., & Lo, C. K. (2019). Investigating the effects of gamification-enhanced flipped learning on undergraduate students’ behavioral and cognitive engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(8), 1106-1126. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1495653
  18. Huang, Y.-N., & Hong, Z.-R. (2016). The effects of a flipped English classroom intervention on students’ information and communication technology and English reading comprehension. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(2), 175-193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9412-7
  19. Jian, Q. (2019). Effects of digital flipped classroom teaching method integrated cooperative learning model on learning motivation and outcome. Electronic Library, 37(5), 842-859. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-02-2019-0024
  20. Khan, M., & Ibrahim, M. (2017). Flipped classroom in technology courses–Impact on personal efficacy and perception based on learning style preferences. In Proceedings of the 7th IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (pp. 135-142). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISECon.2017.7910229
  21. Kim, M. K., Khera, S. M., Khera, O., & Getman, J. (2014). The experience of three flipped classrooms in an urban university: An exploration of design principles. Internet and Higher Education, 22, 37-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.04.003
  22. Kurt, G. (2017). Implementing the flipped classroom in teacher education: Evidence from Turkey. Educational Technology and Society, 20(1), 211-221.
  23. Lai, C.-L., & Hwang, G.-J. (2016). A self-regulated flipped classroom approach to improving students’ learning performance in a mathematics course. Computers and Education, 100, 126-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.006
  24. Li, F., Qi, J., Wang, G., & Wang, X. (2014). Traditional classroom VS e-learning in higher education: Difference between students’ behavioral engagement. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 9(2), 48-51. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v9i2.3268
  25. Lin, H. C., Hwang, G. J., & Hsu, Y. D. (2019). Effects of ASQ-based flipped learning on nurse practitioner learners’ nursing skills, learning achievement and learning perceptions. Computers and Education, 139(12), 207-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.05.014
  26. Long, T., Cummins, J., & Waugh, M. (2018). Investigating the factors that influence higher education instructors’ decisions to adopt a flipped classroom instructional model. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(4), 2028-2039. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12703
  27. Margolis, H., & Mccabe, P. P. (2006). Improving self-efficacy and motivation: What to do, what to say. Intervention in School and Clinic, 41(4), 218-227. https://doi.org/10.1177/10534512060410040401
  28. Masood, M., Samaila, K., & Chau, K. T. (2022). Application of SQQ-based flipped classroom model on students’ achievement and engagement in ICT Course. Mediterranean Journal of Social & Behavioral Research, 6(1), 21-26. https://doi.org/10.30935/mjosbr/11527
  29. Mustafa, M. N. (2014). The effects of gender differences in ICT application: Bridging the gap of knowledge and skills among teachers. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 8(7), 81-86.
  30. Namaziandost, E., & Cakmak, F. (2020). An account of EFL learners’ self-efficacy and gender in the flipped classroom model. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 4041-4055. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10167-7
  31. Nederveld, A., & Berge, Z. L. (2015). Flipped learning in the workplace. Journal of Workplace Learning, 27(2), 162-172. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-06-2014-0044
  32. Ode, E. O. (2017). Impact of gender on information literacy skills of students of library and information science department, university of maiduguri. IP Indian Journal of Library Science and Information Technology, 2(2), 91-96.
  33. Peethambaran, M. K., V. G., R. R., & Murthy, S. (2018). Flipped classroom strategy to help underachievers in Java programming. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering (pp. 44-49). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/latice.2018.000-7
  34. Raman, A., Rathakrishnan, M., & Thannimalai, R. (2019). Flipping the undergraduate classroom: A case study. Journal of Social Sciences Research, 5(1), 134-138. https://doi.org/10.32861/jssr.51.134.138
  35. Rohatgi, A., Scherer, R., & Hatlevik, O. E. (2016). The role of ICT self-efficacy for students’ ICT use and their achievement in a computer and information literacy test. Computers and Education, 102, 103-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.08.001
  36. Samaila, K. J., & Al-Samarraie, H. (2023). Reinventing teaching pedagogy: the benefits of quiz-enhanced flipped classroom model on students’ learning outcomes and engagement. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-04-2023-0173
  37. Samaila, K. J., Masood, M., & Chau, K. T. (2021b). Enhancing student’s engagement and ICT skills through modified flipped classroom model. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Education 2021 “Innovative and Sustainable Education in Times of Challenges” (pp. 78-87).
  38. Samaila, K., Dauda, S., Aliyu, M., & Aliero, A. A. (2021a). Application of ICTs and educational software in teaching physics: Advantages, challenges and proposed solutions. International Journal of Research and Review, 8(1), 293-304.
  39. Samaila, K., Khambari, M. N. M., Kumar, J. A., & Masood, M. (2022). Factors influencing postgraduate students’ intention to use learning management system. Tuning Journal for Higher Education, 9(2), 151-176. https://doi.org/10.18543/tjhe.2177
  40. Samaila, K., Masood, M., & Chau, K. T. (2021c). Using flipped classroom model: Factors influencing students’ satisfaction. European Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Education, 2(2), e02112. https://doi.org/10.30935/ejimed/11260
  41. Sani, Y. G., Samaila, K. J., Dahiru, A. S., Abubakar, A. A., & Sani, A. (2016). The use of information and communication technology (ICT) by lecturers in North-Western Nigeria. Computer Engineering and Intelligent System, 7(8), 1-6.
  42. Sen, E. O. (2022). Thematic analysis of articles on flipped learning in mathematics education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 23(4), 202-222. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1096444
  43. Sezginturk, M., & Sungur, S. (2020). A multidimensional investigation of students’ science self-efficacy: The role of gender. Elementary Education Online, 19(1), 208-218. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2020.653660
  44. Shakibaei, G., Shahamat, F., & Namaziandost, E. (2019). The effect of using authentic texts on Iranian EFL learners’ incidental vocabulary learning: The case of English newspaper. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 2(5), 422-432. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.v2i5.618
  45. Strelan, P., Osborn, A., & Palmer, E. (2020). The flipped classroom: A meta-analysis of effects on student performance across disciplines and education levels. Educational Research Review, 30, 100314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100314
  46. Sulong, A., Ibrahim, A. B., Abas, A., Zunnairah, A., & Bakar, A. (2021). Incorpating gamification in a flipped classroom approach: A review of literature. Jurnal Pendidikan Bitara UPSI [UPSI Bitara Education Journal], 14(1), 22-32.
  47. Tyler, B., & Yessenbayeva, A. (2018). A comparison of flipped programming classroom models–Results by gender and major. In Proceedings of the IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (pp. 1-5). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2018.8658809
  48. Velazquez, J. (2020). The impact of flipped learning and think-pair-share on aviation student academic performance. International Journal of Aviation Research, 12(01), 54-62. https://doi.org/10.22488/okstate.19.100202
  49. Vighnarajah, Luan, W. S., & Abu Bakar, K. (2008). The shift in the role of teachers in the learning process. European Journal of Social Sciences, 7(2), 33-41.
  50. Vogel, F. R., & Human-Vogel, S. (2016). Academic commitment and self-efficacy as predictors of academic achievement in additional materials science. Higher Education Research and Development, 35(6), 1298-1310. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1144574
  51. Wang, L., Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2004). Increasing preservice teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for technology integration. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(3), 231-250. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2004.10782414
  52. Wen, A. S., Zaid, N. M., & Harun, J. (2016). Enhancing students ICT problem solving skills using flipped classroom model. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Engineering Education (pp. 187-192). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEED.2016.7856069
  53. Xu, Z., & Shi, Y. (2018). Application of constructivist theory in flipped classroom–Take college English teaching as a case study. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 8(7), 880-887. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0807.21
  54. Ye, X. D., Chang, Y. H., & Lai, C. L. (2019). An interactive problem-posing guiding approach to bridging and facilitating pre- and in-class learning for flipped classrooms. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(8), 1075-1092. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1495651
  55. Zainuddin, Z., Haruna, H., Li, X., Zhang, Y., & Chu, S. K. W. (2019). A systematic review of flipped classroom empirical evidence from different fields: What are the gaps and future trends? On the Horizon, 27(2), 72-86. https://doi.org/10.1108/OTH-09-2018-0027
  56. Zhai, X., Gu, J., Liu, H., Liang, J. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2017). An experiential learning perspective on students’ satisfaction model in a flipped classroom context. Educational Technology and Society, 20(1), 198-210.
  57. Zou, D. (2020). Gamified flipped EFL classroom for primary education: Student and teacher perceptions. Journal of Computers in Education, 7(2), 213-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-020-00153-w