Journal of Digital Educational Technology

• Aesaert, K., & van Braak, J. (2015). Gender and socioeconomic related differences in performance-based ICT competences. Computers & Education, 84, 8-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.017
• Ala-Mutka, K. (2011). Mapping digital competence: Towards a conceptual understanding. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies.
• Amissah, P. B. (2023). Digital literacy skills and teacher preparedness for the 2019 curriculum: A case of basic school teachers in Cape Coast Metropolis [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Cape Coast.
• Analysis INN. (2020). KMO and Bartlett’s test of sphericity. ANN. https://www.analysisinn.com/post/kmo-and-bartlett-s-test-of-sphericity/
• Atomic Learning, Inc. (2014). Self-assessment instrument v2.0. Atomic Learning. Retrieved November 25, 2025, from Internet Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20160101000000/http://www.atomiclearning.com/assessyourself
• Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
• Bawden, D. (2008). Digital literacy: A research agenda. Journal of Information Literacy, 2(1), 12-14.
• Benton, S. L., Duchon, D., & Pallett, W. H. (2013). Validity of student self-reported ratings of learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(4), 377-388. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.636799
• Bisits, P. (2023). How to choose a sample size (for the statistically challenged). tools4dev. https://tools4dev.org/resources/how-to-choose-a-sample-size/
• Brevik, L. M., Gudmundsdottir, G. B., Lund, A., & Strømme, T. A. (2019). Transformative agency in teacher education: Fostering professional digital competence. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, Article 102875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.07.005
• Chang, Y. T., Liu, S. M., Park, H., & Roh, Y. (2016). Cruise traveler satisfaction at a port of call. Maritime Policy & Management, 43(4), 483-494. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2015.1107920
• Chere-Masopha, J. (2018). Personal landscapes of teacher professional identities versus digital technology adoption and integration in Lesotho schools. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 17(3), 28-42. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.17.3.3
• Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research, 295(2), 295-336.
• Chukwuemeka, E. J., Nsofor, C. C., Falode, O. C., & Aniah, A. (2019). Assessing pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) self-efficacy towards technology integration in colleges of education in South-West Nigeria. Federal University of Technology, Minna.
• Claro, M., Preiss, D. D., San Martín, E., Jara, I., Hinostroza, J. E., Valenzuela, S., Cortes, F., & Nussbaum, M. (2012). Assessment of 21st-century ICT skills in Chile: Test design and results from high school level students. Computers & Education, 59(3), 1042-1053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.004
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.
• Csernoch, M., Kiss, J. T., Takács, V., & Máté, D. (2024). Exploring higher education competencies through spreadsheet self-assessment and time. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.12974
• DQ Institute. (2018). DQ global standards report: Digital intelligence framework. Coalition for digital intelligence. DQ Institute. https://www.dqinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/DQSealPrintFinal.pdf
• DQ Institute. (2024). DQ framework: Global standards for digital literacy, skills, and readiness. DQ Institute. https://live.dqinstitute.org/dq-framework/
• Edumadze, J. K. E. (2023). The effect of blended massive open online courses on students’ perceptions of their engagement and learning outcomes [Doctoral dissertation, University of KwaZulu-Natal].
• Edumadze, J. K. E., & Govender, D. W. (2024). The community of inquiry as a tool for measuring student engagement in blended massive open online courses (MOOCs): A case study of university students in a developing country. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), Article 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00306-9
• Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2004). Digital literacy: A conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(1), 93-106.
• Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2012). Thinking in the digital era: A revised model for digital literacy. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 9, 267-276. https://doi.org/10.28945/1621
• Ferrari, A. (2013). DIGCOMP: A framework for developing and understanding digital competence in Europe. Publications Office of the European Union.
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
• FutureLearn. (2020). The complete guide to digital skills. FutureLearn. https://www.futurelearn.com/info/blog/the-complete-guide-to-digital-skills
• Gaffney, C. (2018, November). Understanding the causes of inaccurate self-assessments: Extraversion’s role. In A. B. Bertolini, & M. J. Kaplan (Eds.), Proceedings of the 42^nd annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 238-251). Cascadilla Press.
• Ghosh, D. (2023). The interplay between digital literacy and e-pedagogy in education. International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Technology, 11(4), Article 158.
• Glister, P. (1997). Digital literacy. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
• González-Mujico, F. de L. (2024). Measuring student and educator digital competence beyond self-assessment: Developing and validating two rubric-based frameworks. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 13299-13324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12363-7
• Govender, I. (2025). Digital literacy and STEM skills–What is the connection? A systematic review. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-025-09879-x
• Gui, M., Fasoli, M., & Carradore, R. (2020). Digital skills and self-assessments: The role of gender and education. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 114-122.
• Gujarati, D. N. (2003). Basic econometrics (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
• Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). SAGE.
• Hargittai, E. (2010). Digital na (t) ives? Variation in internet skills and uses among members of the “net generation”. Sociological Inquiry, 80(1), 92-113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.2009.00317.x
• Hatlevik, O. E., & Christophersen, K. A. (2013). Digital competence at the beginning of upper secondary school: Identifying factors explaining digital inclusion. Computers & Education, 63, 240-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.015
• Hatlevik, O. E., Ottestad, G., & Throndsen, I. (2015). Predictors of digital competence in 7^th grade: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(3), 220-231. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12065
• Henderson, C., & Dancy, M. (2017). Increasing the impact and diffusion of STEM education innovations. Frontiers in ICT, 4.
• Herout, L. (2024). Exploring the role of digital literacy in enhancing academic and professional outcomes. In Proceedings of the ICERI2024 (pp. 451-455). IATED. https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2024.0211
• Hinrichsen, J., & Coombs, A. (2013). The five resources of critical digital literacy: A framework for curriculum integration. Research in Learning Technology, 21. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v21.21334
• Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
• Ilomäki, L., Paavola, S., Lakkala, M., & Kantosalo, A. (2016). Digital competence–An emergent boundary concept for policy and educational research. Education and Information Technologies, 21(3), 655-679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-014-9346-4
• International Telecommunication Union. (2020). Digital skills assessment guidebook. ITU Development Sector. https://www.itu.int/hub/publication/d-phcb-cap_bld-04-2020/
• JISC. (2015). Building digital capability: A framework for individuals. JISC. https://digitalcapability.jisc.ac.uk/what-is-digital-capability/individual-digital-capabilities/our-digital-capabilities-framework/
• JISC. (2023). Updated digital capabilities framework for education and research. JISC. https://digitalcapability.jisc.ac.uk/
• Johnson, D. M., & Maddux, C. D. (2019). Technology in education: A twenty-year retrospective. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 51(3), 305-319.
• Johnson, E., & Turner, J. (2018). Trends in higher education: An overview of shifts in college enrollments and strategies for optimal outcomes. Journal of College Admission, 208, 22-29.
• Julien, H. (2018). Digital literacy in theory and practice. In M. Khosrow-Pour (Ed.), Encyclopedia of information science and technology (pp. 2243-2252). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-2255-3.CH195
• Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575
• Kayi, E. A., & van Wyk, M. M. (2025). Exploring Ghanaian distance learners’ views of self-regulated learning strategies and academic performance. Open Praxis, 17(2), 376-393. https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.17.2.783
• Kefalis, C., Skordoulis, C., & Drigas, A. (2023). Digital simulations in STEM education: Insights from recent empirical studies, a systematic review. Encyclopedia, 5(1), Article 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia5010010
• Kline, R. B. (2013). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In Y. Petscher, C. Schatschneider, & D. L. Compton (Eds.), Applied quantitative analysis in education and the social sciences (pp. 171-207). Routledge.
• Knutsen, J. A., & Presser, S. (2010). Question and questionnaire design. In P. H. Rossi, J. D. Wright, & A. B. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of survey research (pp. 263-313). Academic Press.
• Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121-1134. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121
• Kwakwa, V. (2024). Empowering Africa’s youth: Bridging the digital skills gap. World Bank Blogs. https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/nasikiliza/empowering-africa-s-youth--bridging-the-digital-skills-afe-gap
• Law, N. W. Y., Woo, D. J., De la Torre, J., & Wong, K. W. G. (2018). A global framework of reference on digital literacy skills for indicator 4.4.2. UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
• Lee, Y. T., & Fanea-Ivanovici, M. (2023). A review and comparative analysis of digital literacy frameworks–Where are we heading and why? Theoretical and Practical Research in Economic Fields, 14(2), 457-472. https://doi.org/10.14505/tpref.v14.2(28).22
• Martin, A. (2005). DigEuLit–A European framework for digital literacy: A progress report. Journal of eLiteracy, 2(2), 130-136
• Matjašič, M., & Vogrinc, J. (2025). Supporting the development of the perceived and actual research competence of pre-service teachers. Education Sciences, 15(6), Article 652. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15060652
• Mazor, M., & Fleming, S. M. (2021). The Dunning-Kruger effect revisited. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(6), 677-678. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01101-z
• Miranda, P., Isaias, P., & Pifano, S. (2018, May). Digital literacy in higher education: A survey on students’ self-assessment. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning and Collaboration Technologies (pp. 71-87). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91152-6_6
• National Council of Teachers of English. (2019). Definition of literacy in a digital age. NCTE. https://ncte.org/statement/nctes-definition-literacy-digital-age
• National Health Commission of China. (2024). Reference guidelines for application scenarios of artificial intelligence in the health and medical sector. Summary via chambers practice guides. National Health Commission of China.
• Ndibalema, P. (2025). Digital literacy gaps in promoting 21^st century skills among students in higher education institutions in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review. Cogent Education, 12(1), Article 2452085. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2452085
• Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065-1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016
• Nguyen, L. A. T., & Habók, A. (2025). Digital literacy of English majors: Subjective versus objective assessment. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-025-09448-2
• Nieminen, J. H., Yan, Z., & Boud, D. (2025). Self-assessment design in a digital world: Centring student agency. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 50(5), 732-746. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2025.2467647
• Nkansah, J. O., & Oldac, Y. I. (2024). Unraveling the attributions of digital literacy skills and knowledge gap in Ghana’s higher education: Undergraduate students’ voices in a phenomenological study. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 15249-15268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12483-8
• Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
• Omaswa, F., Kiguli-Malwadde, E., Donkor, P., Hakim, J., Derbew, M., Baird, S., Frehywot, S., Gachuno, O. W., Kamiza, S., Kibwage, I. O., Kien, A. M., Mulla, Y., Mullan, F., Nachega, J. B., Nkomazana, O., Noormohamed, E., Ojoome, V., Olalaye, D., Pillay, S., ... De Villiers, M. (2018). The medical education partnership initiative (MEPI): Innovations and lessons for health professions training and research in Africa. Annals of Global Health, 84(1), Article 160. https://doi.org/10.29024/aogh.8
• Öncül, G. (2021). Defining the need: Digital literacy skills for first-year university students. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 13(4), 925-943. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-06-2020-0179
• Pan, Q., Reichert, F., Liang, Q., de la Torre, J., & Law, N. (2025). Measuring digital literacy across ages and over time: Development and validation of a performance-based assessment. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 22065-22100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13592-8
• Patnaik, J., & Bhowmick, B. (2022). Determining appropriateness for management of appropriate technology: An empirical study using factor analysis. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 34(2), 125-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.1890013
• Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants’ part 2: Do they really think differently? On the Horizon, 9(6), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424843
• Redecker, C. (2020). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. Publications Office of the European Union.
• Reichert, F., Pan, Q., & Chen, L. L. (2023). Digital literacy assessment: Background paper for the 2023 global education monitoring report–Technology in education (ED/GEMR/MRT/2023/P1/25 rev.). UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000386202
• Robinson, L. (2021). Digital inequalities in time of pandemic: COVID-19 exposure risk profiles and new forms of vulnerability. First Monday, 26(7). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v25i7.10845
• Robinson, L., Schulz, J., Khilnani, A., Ono, H., Cotten, S. R., McClain, N., Levine, L., Chen, W., Huang, G., Casili, A. A., Tubaro, P., Dodel, M., Quan-Haase, A., Ruiu, M. L., Ragnedda, M., Aikat, D., & Tolentino, N. (2020). Digital inequalities in time of pandemic: COVID-19 exposure risk profiles and new forms of vulnerability. First Monday, 25(10). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v25i7.10845
• Rosales-Márquez, C., Carbonell-García, C. E., Miranda-Vargas, V., Diaz-Zavala, R., & Laura-De La Cruz, K. M. (2025, January). Self-confidence as a predictor of digital skills: A fundamental pillar for the digitalization of higher education. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1515033
• Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Pick, M., Liengaard, B. D., Radomir, L., & Ringle, C. M. (2022). Progress in partial least squares structural equation modeling use in marketing research in the last decade. Psychology & Marketing, 39(5), 1035-1064. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21640
• Sayaf, A. M., Alamri, M. M., Alqahtani, M. A., & Alrahmi, W. M. (2022). Factors influencing university students’ adoption of digital learning technology in teaching and learning. Sustainability, 14(1), Article 493. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010493
• Scheerder, A. J., van Deursen, A. J., & van Dijk, J. A. (2019). Internet use in the home: Digital inequality from a domestication perspective. New Media & Society, 21(10), 2099-2118. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819844299
• Schober, P., Boer, C., & Schwarte, L. A. (2018). Correlation coefficients: Appropriate use and interpretation. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 126(5), 1763-1768. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864
• Song, Y., Lv, S., Wang, M., Wang, Z., & Dong, W. (2025). The impact of digital learning competence on the academic achievement of undergraduate students. Behavioral Sciences, 15(7), Article 840. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15070840
• Spante, M., Hashemi, S. S., Lundin, M., & Algers, A. (2018). Digital competence and digital literacy in higher education research: Systematic review of concept use. Cogent Education, 5(1), Article 1519143. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1519143
• Street, B. (2003). What’s ‘new’ in new literacy studies? Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.52214/cice.v5i2.11369
• Tandiono, R., & Limijaya, A. (2025). Understanding rater bias in self and peer assessment among university students: A cultural psychology perspective. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 34, 1561-1571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-024-00967-7
• Tang, C. M., & Chaw, L. Y. (2016). Digital literacy: A prerequisite for effective learning in a blended learning environment? Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 14(1), 54-65.
• Tavakol, M., & Wetzel, A. (2020). Factor Analysis: A means for theory and instrument development in support of construct validity. International Journal of Medical Education, 11, Article 245. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.5f96.0f4a
• Technology & Social Change Group. (2016). Mobile information literacy curriculum. University of Washington. https://tascha.uw.edu/projects/mobile-information-literacy-curriculum
• Thompson, S. K. (2012). Sampling (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118162934
• UNESCO. (2019). Digital literacy global framework. UNESCO Institute for Statistics. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000371029
• van Dijk, J. A. G. M. & van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & (2014). Digital skills: Unlocking the information society. Springer.
• van Deursen, A. J., & Helsper, E. J. (2015). The third-level digital divide: Who benefits most from being online? In Communication and information technologies annual (pp. 29-52). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2050-206020150000010002
• van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J., van Dijk, J. A., & De Haan, J. (2017). The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 577-588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.010
• Vuorikari, R. & Punie, Y. (2019). The use of reference frameworks to support digitally competent citizens–The case of DigComp. In Digital skills insights (pp. 1-11). ITU.
• Vuorikari, R., Kluzer, S., & Punie, Y. (2022). DigComp 2.2: The digital competence framework for citizens (EUR 31006 EN). Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/115376
• Wang, S. K., Hsu, H. Y., Campbell, T., Coster, D. C., & Longhurst, M. (2014). An investigation of middle school science teachers and students use of technology inside and outside of classrooms: Considering whether digital natives are more technology savvy than their teachers. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(6), 637-662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-014-9355-4
• Wong, B., & Kemp, P. E. (2018). Technical boys and creative girls: The career aspirations of digitally skilled youths. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(3), 301-316. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2017.1325443
• World Bank. (2024). Tracing global trends in education: A tale of old and new gender gaps. Gender Data Portal. https://genderdata.worldbank.org/en/data-stories/a-tale-of-old-and-new-gender-gaps
• World Economic Forum. (2020). The future of jobs report 2020. World Economic Forum.
• Wu, D. (2023). Evaluation and analysis of disparity between self-perception and actual performance for Chinese citizen’s digital literacy. In Proceedings of the 7^th International Conference on Education and Multimedia Technology (pp. 327-332). https://doi.org/10.1145/3625704.3625759
• Yang, R., & Attan, S. A. (2024). Factors influencing digital literacy among university students in Beijing, China. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 11(8), 239-250. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2024.08.025
• Yao, Y., Cao, J., Tan, Z., & Chen, K. (2025). Developing a digital health competency assessment framework for public health services: A Delphi-AHP approach. Frontiers in Public Health, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1634261
• Zeynivandnezhad, F., Rashed, F., & Kanooni, A. (2019). Exploratory factor analysis for TPACK among mathematics teachers: Why, what and how. Anatolian Journal of Education, 4(1), 59-76. https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2019.416a

APA

Edumadze, J. K. E., Edumadze, G. E., Arkaifie, R., Kissiedu, A., Biney, B. A., Essel, D. G., Osei-Gyasi, A., Ankomah, E., Addai, O.-D., & Amenumey, D. E. K. (2026). Beyond self-perception: Evaluating digital literacy across multimedia formats using the atomic digital literacy framework and ICAS benchmarks. Journal of Digital Educational Technology, 6(2), ep2612. https://doi.org/10.29333/jdet/18536

Vancouver

Edumadze JKE, Edumadze GE, Arkaifie R, Kissiedu A, Biney BA, Essel DG, et al. Beyond self-perception: Evaluating digital literacy across multimedia formats using the atomic digital literacy framework and ICAS benchmarks. Journal of Digital Educational Technology. 2026;6(2):ep2612. https://doi.org/10.29333/jdet/18536

AMA

Edumadze JKE, Edumadze GE, Arkaifie R, et al. Beyond self-perception: Evaluating digital literacy across multimedia formats using the atomic digital literacy framework and ICAS benchmarks. Journal of Digital Educational Technology. 2026;6(2), ep2612. https://doi.org/10.29333/jdet/18536

Chicago

Edumadze, John K. E., Gladys Ewurama Edumadze, Richard Arkaifie, Alexander Kissiedu, Benedict Atta Biney, Daniel G. Essel, Alex Osei-Gyasi, Evans Ankomah, Okyere-Darko Addai, and Dagbe E. K. Amenumey. "Beyond self-perception: Evaluating digital literacy across multimedia formats using the atomic digital literacy framework and ICAS benchmarks". Journal of Digital Educational Technology 2026 6 no. 2 (2026): ep2612. https://doi.org/10.29333/jdet/18536

Harvard

Edumadze, J. K. E., Edumadze, G. E., Arkaifie, R., Kissiedu, A., Biney, B. A., Essel, D. G., . . . Amenumey, D. E. K. (2026). Beyond self-perception: Evaluating digital literacy across multimedia formats using the atomic digital literacy framework and ICAS benchmarks. Journal of Digital Educational Technology, 6(2), ep2612. https://doi.org/10.29333/jdet/18536

MLA

Edumadze, John K. E. et al. "Beyond self-perception: Evaluating digital literacy across multimedia formats using the atomic digital literacy framework and ICAS benchmarks". Journal of Digital Educational Technology, vol. 6, no. 2, 2026, ep2612. https://doi.org/10.29333/jdet/18536