Journal of Digital Educational Technology

• Albertson, D., & Johnston, M. P. (2023). Content, tools, and surrogates: Assessing K-12 teachers’ criteria for interactively searching for digital video. Digital Library Perspectives, 39(1), 62-73. https://doi.org/10.1108/DLP-05-2022-0040
• Altıok, S., Başer, Z., & Yükseltürk, E. (2019). Enhancing metacognitive awareness of undergraduates through using an e-educational video environment. Computers and Education, 139, 129-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.05.010
• Anthony, G. (1996). Active learning in a constructivist framework. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 31(4), 349-369. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00369153
• Ariza, J. Á. (2023). Bringing active learning, experimentation, and student-created videos in engineering: A study about teaching electronics and physical computing integrating online and mobile learning. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 31(6), 1723-1749. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22673
• Arruabarrena, R., Sánchez, A., Domínguez, C., & Jaime, A. (2021). A novel taxonomy of student-generated video styles. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00295-6
• Atkinson, A., Bell, P., De La Rosa, I., DeGeorge, T., Jonassen, L., Kokil, V., Lee, S., Malloy, M., Pinzon, K., Robertson, C., Savage, J. C., Shahbaz, R., Villanueva, O., Wludyga, J., & Morris, J. (2024). Student-created videos in online STEM education: A large, interdisciplinary, randomized control study. Discover Education, 3(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00283-8
• Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4(3), 359-373. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1986.4.3.359
• Borba, M. C., Malheiros, A. P. d. S., & Zulatto, R. B. A. (Eds.). (2010). Online distance education. Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789460912931
• Campbell, L. O., Heller, S., & Pulse, L. (2022). Student-created video: An active learning approach in online environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(6), 1145-1154. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1711777
• Cisco Systems Inc. (2023). Cisco annual internet report (2018-2023). CISCO. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/executive-perspectives/annual-internet-report/white-paper-c11-741490.html#Executivesummary
• Colognesi, S., Piret, C., Demorsy, S., & Barbier, E. (2020). Teaching writing—With or without metacognition?: An exploratory study of 11- to 12-year-old students writing a book review. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 12(5), 459-470. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2020562136
• Cooperstein, S. E., & Kocevar-Weidinger, E. (2004). Beyond active learning: A constructivist approach to learning. Reference Services Review, 32(2), 141-148. https://doi.org/10.1108/00907320410537658
• Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2009). “Multiliteracies”: New literacies, new learning. Pedagogies, 4(3), 164-195. https://doi.org/10.1080/15544800903076044
• Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2015). The things you do to know: An introduction to the pedagogy of multiliteracies. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), A pedagogy of multiliteracies (pp. 1-36). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137539724_1
• Coulson, S., & Frawley, J. (2017). Student-generated multimedia for supporting learning in an undergraduate physiotherapy course. ASCILITE Publications. https://doi.org/10.14742/apubs.2017.791
• Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. SAGE.
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. SAGE.
• Doyle, E., Buckley, P., & McCarthy, B. (2021). The impact of content co-creation on academic achievement. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(3), 494-507. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1782832
• Flick, U. (2014). An introduction to qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE.
• Gallardo-Williams, M., Morsch, L. A., Paye, C., & Seery, M. K. (2020). Student-generated video in chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(2), 488-495. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9rp00182d
• Gedera, D. S. P., & Zalipour, A. (2021). Video pedagogy: Theory and practice. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4009-1
• Graul, B., Rollins, M. L., Powers, N., & Corte, D. D. (2022). Student-created video content for assessment and experiential learning. The Physics Teacher, 60(6), 491-495. https://doi.org/10.1119/5.0029343
• Greene, H. (2014). Learning through student created, content videos. International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 07(02), 469-478. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274073117_Learning_through_student_created_content_videos
• Hannafin, M. J., Shepherd, C. E., & Polly, D. (2010). Video assessment of classroom teaching practices: Lessons learned, problems and issues. Educational Technology, 50(1), 32-37.
• Hobbs, R. (2017). Create to learn: Introduction to digital literacy. Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394260201
• Husbye, N. E., & Vander Zanden, S. (2015). Composing film: Multimodality and production in elementary classrooms. Theory into Practice, 54(2), 109-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2015.1010840
• Jewitt, C., & Kress, G. (Eds.). (2003). Multimodal literacy. Peter Lang.
• Jorm, C., Roberts, C., Gordon, C., Nisbet, G., & Roper, L. (2019). Time for university educators to embrace student videography. Cambridge Journal of Education, 49(6), 673-693. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2019.1590528
• Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2008). Language education and multiliteracies. In S. May & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (pp. 195-211). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30424-3_15
• Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2012). Literacies. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139196581
• Kalantzis, M., Cope, B., Chan, E., & Dalley-Trim, L. (2016). Literacies (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316442821
• Kay, R. H. (2012). Exploring the use of video podcasts in education: A comprehensive review of the literature. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 820-831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.01.011
• Kress G., Jewitt, C., Ogborn, J., & Tsatsarelis, C. (2001). Multimodal teaching and learning: The rhetorics of the science classroom. Bloomsbury.
• Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse. Arnold.
• Liasidou, A. (2023). Inclusive pedagogies in digital post-COVID-19 higher education. British Journal of Special Education, 50(1), 6-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8578.12436
• Magnusson, P., & Godhe, A. L. (2019). Multimodality in language education: Implication for teaching. Designs for Learning, 11(1), 127-137. https://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.127
• Makarova, E, A., & Makarova, E, L. (2018). Blending pedagogy and digital technology to transform educational environment. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 6(2), 57-65. https://doi.org/10.5937/ijcrsee1802057M
• McGrail, E., & Behizadeh, N. (2017). K-12 multimodal assessment and interactive audiences: An exploratory analysis of existing frameworks. Assessing Writing, 31, 24-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2016.06.005
• Mintzes, J. J. (2020). From constructivism to active learning in college science. In J. J. Mintzes & E. M. Walter (Eds.), Active learning in college science (pp. 3-14). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33600-4_1
• Mishra, S., & Dey, A. K. (2022). Understanding and identifying ‘themes’ in qualitative case study research. South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, 11(3), 187-192. https://doi.org/10.1177/22779779221134659
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & the PRISMA Group. (2009). Reprint—preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal, 89(9), 873-880. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/89.9.873
• Murray, R., Bell, E., & Wakefield, A. (2023). A model for implementing learner-generated filmmaking into undergraduate teaching and assessment. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 23(1), 72-76. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v23i1.33190
• Müller, L. R., Tipold, A., Ehlers, J. P., & Schaper, E. (2019). TiHoVideos: Veterinary students’ utilization of instructional videos on clinical skills. BMC Veterinary Research, 15(1), 326-338. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-019-2079-2
• Nance, A. L., & Nance, M. (2011). Virtual collaboration in the teaching of interior design and dance: An investigation in interdisciplinary student projects via digital technology. Ubiquitous Learning, 3(3), 153-164. https://doi.org/10.18848/1835-9795/CGP/v03i03/40298
• Nixon, R. (2012). Teaching narrative writing using comics: Delainey and Rasmussen, the creators of Betty, share their composing strategies as rich literacy resources for elementary teachers. Literacy, 46(2), 81-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-4369.2011.00580.x
• Noya, A., Oguro, M., & Horiuchi, S. (2022). Professional learning using storytelling videos of childbirth experiences: A qualitative pilot study of student midwives’ perceptions in Myanmar. Japan Journal of Nursing Science, 19(2), e12456-e12466. https://doi.org/10.1111/jjns.12456
• Oliszewski, A., Fine, D., & Roth, D. (2018). Digital media, projection design, and technology for theatre. Routledge. https://doi-org.proxy1.lib.uwo.ca/10.4324/9781315666976
• Orús, C., Barlés, M. J., Belanche, D., Casaló, L., Fraj, E., & Gurrea, R. (2016). The effects of learner-generated videos for YouTube on learning outcomes and satisfaction. Computers and Education, 95, 254-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.007
• Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S. ... Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, Article n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
• Pereira, J., Echeazarra, L., Sanz-Santamaría, S., & Gutiérrez, J. (2014). Student-generated online videos to develop cross-curricular and curricular competencies in nursing studies. Computers in Human Behavior, 31(1), 580-590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.011
• Proudfoot, K. (2023). Inductive/deductive hybrid thematic analysis in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 17(3), 308-326. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898221126816
• Reeves, T., Caglayan, E., & Torr, R. (2017). Don’t shoot! understanding students’ experiences of video-based learning and assessment in the arts. Video Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 2(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40990-016-0011-2
• Ribosa, J., & Duran, D. (2022a). Do students learn what they teach when generating teaching materials for others? A meta-analysis through the lens of learning by teaching. Educational Research Review, 37, 100475-100491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100475
• Rice, M. F., & Ortiz, K. R. (2021). Evaluating digital instructional materials for K-12 online and blended learning. TechTrends, 65(6), 977-992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00671-z
• Ribosa, J., & Duran, D. (2022b). Student-generated teaching materials: A scoping review mapping the research field. Education in the Knowledge Society, 23, 27443-27458. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.27443
• Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE.
• Sánchez-López, I., Pérez-Rodríguez, A., & Fandos-Igado, M. (2019). Com-educational platforms: Creativity and community for learning. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 8(2), 214-226. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2019.7.437
• Snead, S. L., Loch, B., & Keane, T. (2023). Teacher perspectives on adoption of student-made screencasts as a peer learning approach in secondary school mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 54(10), 2086-2102. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2023.2204106
• Snowball, J. D., & McKenna, S. (2017). Student-generated content: An approach to harnessing the power of diversity in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(5), 604-618. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1273205
• The New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 60-93. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u
• Vale, E., & Falloon, G. (2024). Using learning analytics to understand K-12 learner behavior in online video-based learning. Online Learning, 28(1), 44-68. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i1.3675
• Vonderau, P. (2016). The video bubble: Multichannel networks and the transformation of YouTube. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 22(4), 361-375. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856516641882
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Havard University Press.
• Williams, M., & Moser, T. (2019). The art of coding and thematic exploration in qualitative research. International Management Review, 15(1), 45-72.
• Wong, J. T., Mesghina, A., Chen, E., Yeung, N. A., Lerner, B. S., & Richland, L. E. (2023). Zooming in or zoning out: Examining undergraduate learning experiences with Zoom and the role of mind-wandering. Computers & Education Open, 4, Article 100118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100118
• Yang, Y.-T. C., & Wu, W.-C. I. (2012). Digital storytelling for enhancing student academic achievement, critical thinking, and learning motivation: A year-long experimental study. Computers and Education, 59(2), 339-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.012
• Young, C., & Rasinski, T. V. (2013). Student-produced movies as a medium for literacy development. The Reading Teacher, 66(8), 670-675. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1175
• Yu, Z., & Yu, L. (2021). A meta-analysis of Facebook-assisted learning outcomes and their gender differences. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 13(4), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJMBL.2021100104
• Zapata, G. C., Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (Eds.). (2023). Multiliteracies in international educational contexts: Towards education justice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003349662
• Zhang, W., Wang, Y., Yang, L., & Wang, C. (2020). Suspending classes without stopping learning: China’s education emergency management policy in the COVID-19 outbreak. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(3), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13030055
• Zhu, J., Yuan, H., Zhang, Q., Huang, P.-H., Wang, Y., Duan, S., Lei, M., Lim, E. G., & Song, P. (2022). The impact of short videos on student performance in an online-flipped college engineering course. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), 327-327. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01355-6

APA

Hu, L., & Kim, M. S. (2026). Student-generated videos as assessment tools to enhance learning outcomes in K-12 education: A systematic review. Journal of Digital Educational Technology, 6(1), ep2609. https://doi.org/10.29333/jdet/18105

Vancouver

Hu L, Kim MS. Student-generated videos as assessment tools to enhance learning outcomes in K-12 education: A systematic review. Journal of Digital Educational Technology. 2026;6(1):ep2609. https://doi.org/10.29333/jdet/18105

AMA

Hu L, Kim MS. Student-generated videos as assessment tools to enhance learning outcomes in K-12 education: A systematic review. Journal of Digital Educational Technology. 2026;6(1), ep2609. https://doi.org/10.29333/jdet/18105

Chicago

Hu, Li, and Mi Song Kim. "Student-generated videos as assessment tools to enhance learning outcomes in K-12 education: A systematic review". Journal of Digital Educational Technology 2026 6 no. 1 (2026): ep2609. https://doi.org/10.29333/jdet/18105

Harvard

Hu, L., and Kim, M. S. (2026). Student-generated videos as assessment tools to enhance learning outcomes in K-12 education: A systematic review. Journal of Digital Educational Technology, 6(1), ep2609. https://doi.org/10.29333/jdet/18105

MLA

Hu, Li et al. "Student-generated videos as assessment tools to enhance learning outcomes in K-12 education: A systematic review". Journal of Digital Educational Technology, vol. 6, no. 1, 2026, ep2609. https://doi.org/10.29333/jdet/18105