Research Article

The role of artificial intelligence in transforming the writing process: Benefits, limitations, and future opportunities

Zoleikha Shahbazi 1 * , Ebrahim Mohammadkarimi 1 , Shirzad Yousefiazar 1 , Karzan Othman 1
More Detail
1 University of Raparin, Ranya, IRAQ* Corresponding Author
Journal of Digital Educational Technology, 5(2), July 2025, ep2516, https://doi.org/10.30935/jdet/17480
Submitted: 18 February 2025, Published: 02 December 2025
OPEN ACCESS   124 Views   99 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

This study focuses on the effect of artificial intelligence (AI) technology on the writing process from its positive effects and limitations to the outlook. A mixed-methods research design was used with focused on 197 English as a foreign language (EFL) teachers and 274 learners from the countries of Iran and Turkey. The quantitative statistics received from the administration of structured questionnaires indicate that all the study respondents had a similar belief about the role of AI tools in improving the quality and speed of writing tasks. Moreover, focus group discussions show that respondents see its ability to eliminate the language barrier, provide tailored instruction on writing, and handle nuisances with focus on students, which is appealing. There is, however, a more complex view that emerges and stresses the importance of recognizing the advantages of these technologies against their shortfalls, which have been documented in the corpus. In an interesting twist, postgraduate students appear to be more value oriented than classification intending angels since they aim for quality content, while undergraduate students appear to prefer the speed at which AI services may offer them assistance. These findings add another dimension exploring the ongoing transformations that writing embraces in this age of advanced technology as it brings interactivity among educators, students, and AI at all times in readiness for different tasks. The present study is hence beneficial to both teachers and learners because it provides insights on how AI can be used in writing improvement and its limitations.

CITATION (APA)

Shahbazi, Z., Mohammadkarimi, E., Yousefiazar, S., & Othman, K. (2025). The role of artificial intelligence in transforming the writing process: Benefits, limitations, and future opportunities. Journal of Digital Educational Technology, 5(2), ep2516. https://doi.org/10.30935/jdet/17480

REFERENCES

  1. Adams, D., & Chuah, K.-M. (2022). Artificial intelligence-based tools in research writing: Current trends and future potentials. In P. P. Churi, S. Joshi, M. Elhoseny, & A. Omrane (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in higher education (pp. 169-184). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003184157-9
  2. Al-Bukhrani, M. A., Alrefaee, Y. M. H., & Tawfik, M. (2025). Adoption of AI writing tools among academic researchers: A theory of reasoned action approach. PLoS ONE, 20(1), Article e0313837. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0313837
  3. Alessandro, C., Lorenzo, B., Pierpaolo, L., Pinfield, S., & Bianchi, G. (2021). AI-assisted peer review. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8, Article 25. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00703-8
  4. Alkaissi, H., & McFarlane, S. I. (2023). Artificial hallucinations in ChatGPT: Implications in scientific writing. Cureus, 15(2), Article e35179. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.35179
  5. Barrot, J. S. (2021). Using automated written corrective feedback in the writing classrooms: Effects on L2 writing accuracy. Computer-Assisted Language Learning, 36(4), 584-607. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1936071
  6. Biermann, O. C., Ma, N. F., & Yoon, D. (2022). From tool to companion: Storywriters want AI writers to respect their personal values and writing strategies. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (pp. 1209-1227). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3532106.3533506
  7. Black, R. W., & Tomlinson, B. (2025). University students describe how they adopt AI for writing and research in a general education course. Scientific Reports, 15, Article 8799. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92937-2
  8. Campbell, M. (2019). Teaching academic writing in higher education. Education Quarterly Reviews, 2(3), 608-614. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.02.03.92
  9. Chaves, A. P., & Gerosa, M. A. (2021). How should my chatbot interact? A survey on social characteristics in human-chatbot interaction design. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 37(8), 729-758. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1841438
  10. Chen, T. J. (2023). ChatGPT and other artificial intelligence applications speed up scientific writing. Journal of the Chinese Medical Association, 86(4), 351-353. https://doi.org/10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000900
  11. Cheng, K., Li, Z., He, Y., Guo, Q., Lu, Y., Gu, S., & Wu, H. (2023). Potential use of artificial intelligence in infectious disease: Take ChatGPT as an example. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 51, 1130-1135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-023-03203-3
  12. Deniz, G. (2023). The role of artificial intelligence in academic paper writing and its prospective application as a co-author: A letter to the editor. European Journal of Therapeutics, 30(1), 84-86. https://doi.org/10.58600/eurjther1808
  13. Dergaa, I., Chamari, K., Zmijewski, P., & Saad, H. B. (2023). From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: Examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing. Biology of Sport, 40(2), 615-622. https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2023.125623
  14. Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., & Ahuja, M. (2023). So what if ChatGPT wrote it? Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, Article 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
  15. Fitria, T. N. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI) technology in OpenAI ChatGPT application: A review of ChatGPT in writing English essay. ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching, 12(1), 44-58. https://doi.org/10.15294/elt.v12i1.64069
  16. Floridi, L., & Chiriatti, M. (2020). GPT-3: Its nature, scope, limits, and consequences. Minds and Machines, 30, 681-694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09548-1
  17. Gayed, J. M., Carlon, M. K. J., Oriola, A. M., & Cross, J. S. (2022). Exploring an AI-based writing assistant’s impact on English language learners. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, Article 100055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100055
  18. Godwin-Jones, R. (2022). Partnering with AI: Intelligent writing assistance and instructed language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 26(2), 124-128. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/73474
  19. Kessler, G. (2018). Technology and the future of language teaching. Foreign Language Annals, 51(1), 205-218. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12318
  20. Koltovskaia, S. (2020). Student engagement with automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) provided by Grammarly: A multiple case study. Assessing Writing, 44, Article 100450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100450
  21. Lund, B. D., & Wang, T. (2023). Chatting about ChatGPT: How may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries? Library Hi Tech News, 40(3), 26-29. https://doi.org/10.1108/lhtn-01-2023-0009
  22. McKee, H. A., & Porter, J. E. (2020). Ethics for AI writing: The importance of rhetorical context. In Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (pp. 110-116). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3375627.3375811
  23. Mohammadkarimi, E. (2022). Analytic assessment of TEFL undergraduate students’ writings: Diagnosing areas of strength and weakness. International Journal of Language Testing, 12(2), 25-44. https://doi.org/10.22034/IJLT.2022.157123
  24. Mohammadkarimi, E. (2023). Teachers’ reflections on academic dishonesty in EFL students’ writings in the era of artificial intelligence. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.2.10
  25. Nazari, N., Shabbir, M. S., & Setiawan, R. (2021). Application of Artificial Intelligence powered digital writing assistant in higher education: Randomized controlled trial. Heliyon, 7(5), Article e07014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07014
  26. Polce, E. M., & Kunze, K. N. (2023). A guide for the application of statistics in biomedical studies concerning machine learning and artificial intelligence. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 39(2), 151-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2022.04.016
  27. Puntoni, S., Reczek, R. W., Giesler, M., & Botti, S. (2021). Consumers and artificial intelligence: An experiential perspective. Journal of Marketing, 85(1), 131-151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242920953847
  28. Salvagno, M., Taccone, F. S., & Gerli, A. G. (2023). Can artificial intelligence help for scientific writing?. Critical Care, 27, Article 75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04380-2
  29. Shi, Z., Liu, F., Lai, C., & Jin, T. (2022). Enhancing the use of evidence in argumentative writing through collaborative processing of content-based automated writing evaluation feedback. Language Learning & Technology, 26(2), 106-128. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/73481
  30. Sumakul, D. T. Y., Hamied, F. A., & Sukyadi, D. (2022, February). Students’ perceptions of the use of AI in a writing class. In Proceedings of the 67th TEFLIN International Virtual Conference & the 9th ICOELT 2021 (pp. 52-57). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220201.009
  31. Tang, A., Tam, R., Cadrin-Chênevert, A., Guest, W., Chong, J., Barfett, J., Chepelev, L., Cairns, R., Mitchell, J. R., & Cicero, M. D. (2018). Canadian Association of Radiologists white paper on artificial intelligence in radiology. Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal, 69(2), 120-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carj.2018.02.002
  32. Yang, K., Raković, M., Liang, Z., Yan, L., Zeng, Z., Fan, Y., Gašević, D., & Chen, G. (2025). Modifying AI, enhancing essays: How active engagement with generative AI boosts writing quality. In Proceedings of the 15th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference (pp. 568-578). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3706468.3706544
  33. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, Article 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
  34. Zhao, X. (2022). Leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) technology for English writing: Introducing Wordtune as a digital writing assistant for EFL writers. RELC Journal, 54(3), 890-894. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882221094089
  35. Zhao, X., Sbaffi, L., & Cox, A. (2025). The digitisation of writing in higher education: Exploring the use of Wordtune as an AI writing assistant. Electronics, 14(6), Article 1194. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14061194
  36. Zhou, J., Ke, P., Qiu, X., Huang, M., & Zhang, J. (2024). ChatGPT: Potential, prospects, and limitations. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering, 25, 6–11. https://doi.org/10.1631/FITEE.2300089